|
Or maybe 3 bridges, two highways, a roadblock, and couple of international
border checks too far for the 2008 Steamers season. All over now at any rate, time
to hit the beach, at least for most of the players. Perhaps one or two looking
at packing bags and heading on a northern tour in black jerseys to finish with,
and others, well, reflect with no little pride, and think bigger and better next
season...
Why though, did the season fall apart after such a great start? Plain
and simple, not enough quality players, and perhaps a dollop of thick coaching
thrown in for good measure...
While there was a pretty handy starting XV, after that, the depth was not
great (non existant in the blouse department), or not used (the regular fatties
on the bench were all more than able of starting a game). So basically,
the starting lineup was flogged to death, and as the season went on, their
performance dropped accordingly.
So by flogging the dead horse, the coaching cartel came into the finals with
no powder in the keg, with no bullets to fire, and relied on luck and pluck to
get through. Luck and pluck just won't cut the mustard though in this day
and age. (Just how many clichés can you pack into a paragraph, the mind
boggles).
So what could have been done here to have a slightly fresher team heading
into the last furlongs of the NPC?
For the small numbers, the answer is simple. More subbing, and sooner.
At prop Arden David-Perrot should have been coming off the bench much earlier
in matches - perhaps even at halftime in some games, meaning that McGoughan and
Savage would be playing a game and a half out of every two games - meaning
fresher legs for longer in the season - perhaps McGoughan would not have come
down with his back problem and missed the quarter final against Southland if he
had not been used so often. Mind you, this tactic would have worked a lot
better had David-Perrot not been recalled from his loan deal by Wellington every
six minutes - but that is for another debate...
Hooker you had the unheralded Elmiger on the bench behind the hard working
Pareanga. Elmiger a better ball carrier than the four square starting
hooker, and more game time for him would have been in order - at least 30
minutes a match. This would have also given him more time on the field 'in
battle', and kept his hand in at lienout time, where his accuracy fell off
during the season. Mind you, it is hard when you get 8 minutes on the
field each week...
You then had the locks, both the starters hard workers, but again, flogged to
death. Retallick and Moore could have got the same deal as the props,
meaning fresher for longer. Big reserve lock / flanker Aiden Kuka is a far
better ball runner than the two starting locks. So not only would have
resting the starters kept them going longer, it would have also added some
impact and 'ooomph' to the Bay's pack in the closing stages of the match.
Then the loose trio. Again, a quality replacement on the bench in the
young Luke Braid. Again, you could have given the youngster at least 40
minutes a game, meaning that the starting trio of Latimer, Bourke and King would
be playing two and a half games out of three. Even perhaps resting them
for a whole game when they are carrying injuries, which by all accounts Bourke
and King were as the season closed out. Big Kuka would have been an option
here too.
So for the fatties, if you had these four subbing on from minutes 40-50 of a
match, you would have kept the powder dry for the later parts of the season, and
also upped the tempo of the Bay pack week in and week out. A one, two,
three, four, punch so to speak. In the cases of the front rowers early
subbing is not all bad, as if they are injured, you can bring the subbed off
player back into the game. More of a risk taking off the locks and loosies,
but who dares, wins...
The blouses though, the cupboard was bare - these boys just keep them on the
field for as long as we can. A 75% Delany is better than a 100% Haimona.
So sod all could have been done different here. Next season though, more
quality backs need to be called into the union, or found from somewhere, or
something!!
So those were the bridges too far, and how to fix them, kind of. We saw
the result, in the last two matches of the season, against the 'other' Bay and
in the semi against Southland. The Bay boys, in both games went out and
were in touch in both games for the first half, and then it all turned to
custard from then on in. In fact, if you look through the second half of
the season, that was the pattern. Against Auckland, looking comfortable at
the half, losing, Southland in round robin, looking comfortable until the half,
and then clinging on for the win.
Certainly a season of two halves, with plenty to work on for next season.
Fingers crossed the players can be kept in house. Moore heading
overseas again apparently, Braid being wooed by the pricks from up north in the
blue and white stripes, and David-Perrot, well who knows with the farked up loan
system - he might end up at Horowhenua-Kapiti next season... Anyway, if
the same forwards could be kept in the Bay, with perhaps another lock and prop
targeted for depth.
The backline. Where to start? Wings. We need more size, or
at least one wing with a bit if size - MacDonald has got the goods, but is a
hobbit. Having two hobbit wings does not work to well, so a human sized
wing would be nice to back up Hona, who I think is worth persevering with -
he'll get better. Another midfielder too would help - Hunt has a mortgage
on the 12 jersey, so a back up 12 / 13 would be nice. Along with a back up
for Delany and Frodo Tipuna at halfback. Halfback not so urgent, with
young Josh Hall not looking too shabby.
So a couple of outside backs, and a midfielder and a inside back would be a
treat for next season, and another tilt at the NPC title, this time with more
ammo left to fire at the business end of the season.
|